Home

THE CREATOR MAY BE IMPERSONAL AND THE WORD GOD TOTALLY UNFIT FOR IT

Impersonal cosmism is worth considering.

Why is there something rather than nothing?

Rather than say there is no reason, one may settle for holding non-material energy may be the answer.

This ground of being or a foundational energy does not require, logically or otherwise, consciousness, intent, or intelligence to function as the source of existence.

There could be forms of consciousness, intent or intelligence so different from how we see them. Perhaps our words for them and ideas of them are useless.

But we do not need them at all.  The force may be just a blind source. It does not need to be alive in any sense - real or analogical sense.

Here is how this perspective aligns with established philosophical and scientific frameworks:

The Scientific Parallel:

In modern physics, we often look to the quantum vacuum or fundamental fields (like the Higgs field) as the underlying fabric of reality. These fields fluctuate and give rise to particles, matter, and eventually the universe. This energy is creative and foundational, but it is entirely non-conscious and operates purely on physical laws.

Philosophical Neutral Monism:

This is the view that the ultimate reality is made of one underlying "stuff" that is neither inherently mental nor inherently physical. It is just a neutral, raw source or energy from which both physical matter and conscious minds eventually emerge.

Eastern Philosophy (The Tao):

In Daoism, the Tao (The Way) is the ultimate, indescribable source of everything. It is often described not as a conscious, thinking deity, but as a nameless, effortless flow or principle that generates the universe naturally, much like water flowing downhill.

By viewing the ground of being as a blind, neutral, or non-conscious source, you bypass the "problem of evil" and the need for divine teleology (the idea that everything happens for a pre-planned reason). The universe simply is, arising naturally out of a foundational energetic reality.

Also, God belief tries in vain to show that God and morality would be inherently married.  It defeats itself.  God cannot come first or matter that much.

All Pages
PDF Downloads