Home

Miracles in Context: Josephus, Jerusalem, and the Literary Precedents for the Gospels

"How plausible is the idea that Josephus—who sometimes wrote in a quasi-religious style, including accounts of miracles he allegedly witnessed—may have influenced early Christians, either by shaping the Gospels themselves or by unintentionally prompting the notion that written Gospels were needed, especially given that Jesus did not return as his followers had expected?"

1. Josephus’ Style and Content

Josephus (37–c.100 CE) wrote historical works like The Jewish War and Antiquities of the Jews.

While he was a historian, some passages in Antiquities (e.g., the Testimonium Flavianum) have miraculous or highly favorable depictions of Jesus, though scholars debate how much is authentic.

Josephus sometimes reports divine signs, miracles, or extraordinary events in Jewish history (like Moses, Elijah, or Herod). Some passages are quasi-religious in tone, even in what he frames as history.

2. Timeline

Josephus wrote Antiquities around 93–94 CE.

The canonical Gospels were likely written between 70–100 CE, with Mark generally considered first (~70 CE), Matthew and Luke around 80–90 CE, and John ~90–100 CE.

So, the timing is overlapping. Some parts of Josephus could theoretically have been known to early Christians, but whether the gospels were influenced directly is tricky.

3. Evidence of Direct Influence

There is no solid evidence that the gospel writers had Josephus’ works in front of them.

Early Christians were more likely drawing on:

Oral traditions about Jesus’ life and teachings.

Jewish scripture motifs, like Messianic prophecies.

Hellenistic biographical styles, which could include miraculous embellishments.

Some scholars speculate that Josephus’ style shows that a mixture of history and religious narrative was common, so gospels could have emerged in a similar literary culture, not necessarily because of Josephus specifically.

4. Miracles in Historical Writing

In the ancient world, historians (Josephus, Suetonius, Tacitus) occasionally included wonders, prodigies, or divine signs as part of their historical narrative.

Early Christians could have been inspired by this genre convention, not Josephus per se.

5. Sustainability of Your Hypothesis

Weak form (cultural inspiration): Plausible. Josephus exemplifies a culture where miraculous events could appear in historical narrative; early Christians could have felt this was an acceptable way to narrate Jesus’ life.

Strong form (direct prompting or textual influence): Less sustainable. No evidence early Christians read Josephus closely enough to “model” gospel narratives on him. Most gospel material comes from oral traditions, liturgical storytelling, and scriptural exegesis rather than historical texts.

✅ Conclusion

Your idea is interesting and partially plausible, but it’s more likely indirect influence through cultural-literary norms than direct textual prompting. Josephus shows that blending history with miracles wasn’t taboo, so early Christians could legitimize gospel storytelling in a similar vein—but the gospels probably didn’t derive their plots or miracles from Josephus himself.

A PROTO-GOSPEL IN THE JEWISH WAR

Jesus enunciates the “Little Apocalypse” in Mark 13. This can stand on its own as a coherent teaching and prophecy and is arguably the heart of the book, the one essential part.

It can be an apocalyptic gospel by itself. It makes a good match with the writings of Josephus. The relevant writings follow.

CHAPTER 9.

Now when Titus was come into this [upper] city, he admired not only some other places of strength in it, but particularly those strong towers which the tyrants, in their mad conduct, had relinquished; for when he saw their solid altitude, and the largeness of their several stones, and the exactness of their joints; as also how great was their breadth, and how extensive their length, he expressed himself after the manner following: “We have certainly had God for our assistant in this war: and it was no other than God who ejected the Jews out of these fortifications; for what could the hands of men, or any machines, do towards overthrowing these towers?” At which time he had many such discourses to his friends. He also let such go free, as had been bound by the tyrants, and were left in the prisons.

And now, since his soldiers were already quite tired with killing men, and yet there appeared to be a vast multitude still remaining alive, Caesar gave orders that they should kill none but those that were in arms, and opposed them, but should take the rest alive. But, together with those whom they had orders to slay, they slew the aged and the infirm; but for those that were in their flourishing age, and who might be useful to them, they drove them together into the temple, and shut them up within the walls of the court of the women; over which Caesar set one of his freed‑men, as also Fronto, one of his own friends; which last was to determine every one’s fate, according to his merits. So this Fronto slew all those that had been seditious and robbers, who were impeached one by another; but of the young men he chose out the tallest and most beautiful, and reserved them for the triumph; and as for the rest of the multitude that were above seventeen years old, he put them into bonds, and sent them to the Egyptian mines. Titus also sent a great number into the provinces, as a present to them, that they might be destroyed upon their theatres, by the sword and by the wild beasts; but those that were under seventeen years of age were sold for slaves. Now during the days wherein Fronto was distinguishing these men, there perished, for want of food, eleven thousand; some of whom did not taste any food, through the hatred their guards bore to them; and others would not take in any when it was given them. The multitude also was so very great that they were in want even of corn for their sustenance.

Now the number of those that were carried captive during this whole war was collected to be ninety‑seven thousand; as was the number of those that perished during the whole siege eleven hundred thousand, the greater part of whom were indeed of the same nation [with the citizens of Jerusalem], but not belonging to the city itself; for they were come up from all the country to the feast of unleavened bread, and were on a sudden shut up by an army; which at the very first occasioned so great a straitness among them, that there came a pestilential destruction upon them; and soon afterward such a famine, as destroyed them more suddenly. And that this city could contain so many people in it is manifest by that number of them which was taken under Cestius. Who being desirous of informing Nero of the power of the city, who otherwise was disposed to contemn that nation, intreated the High‑priests, if the thing were possible, to take the number of their whole multitude. So these High‑priests, upon the coming of that feast which is called the Passover, when they slay their sacrifices, from the ninth hour till the eleventh; but so that a company not less than ten belong to every sacrifice: (for ’tis not lawful for them to feast singly by themselves). And many of us are twenty in a company. Now the number of sacrifices was two hundred fifty‑six thousand and five hundred: which, upon the allowance of no more than ten that feast together, amounts to two millions seven hundred thousand and two hundred persons that were pure and holy. For as to those that have the leprosy, or the gonorrhœa; or women that have their monthly courses, or such as are otherwise polluted, it is not lawful for them to be partakers of this sacrifice. Nor indeed for any foreigners neither, who come hither to worship.

Now this vast multitude is indeed collected out of remote places, but the entire nation was now shut up by fate as in prison, and the Roman army encompassed the city when it was crowded with inhabitants. Accordingly, the multitude of those that therein perished exceeded all the destructions that either men or God ever brought upon the world; for, to speak only of what was publicly known, the Romans slew some of them, some they carried captives, and others they made a search for under ground, and when they found where they were, they broke up the ground and slew all they met with. There were also found slain there above two thousand persons, partly by their own hands, and partly by one another, but chiefly destroyed by the famine; but then the ill savour of the dead bodies was most offensive to those that lighted upon them, insomuch that some were obliged to get away immediately, while others were so greedy of gain, that they would go in among the dead bodies that lay on heaps, and tread upon them; for a great deal of treasure was found in these caverns, and the hope of gain made every way of getting it to be esteemed lawful. Many also of those that had been put in prison by the tyrants were now brought out; for they did not leave off their barbarous cruelty at the very last: yet did God avenge himself upon them both, in a manner agreeable to justice. As for John, he wanted food, together with his brethren, in these caverns, and begged that the Romans would now give him their right hand for his security, which he had often proudly rejected before; but for Simon, he struggled hard with the distress he was in, until he was forced to surrender himself, as we shall relate hereafter; so he was reserved for the triumph, and to be then slain; as was John condemned to perpetual imprisonment. And now the Romans set fire to the extreme parts of the city, and burnt them down, and entirely demolished its walls.

The Jewish War – Book 6, Chapter 5 (Whiston translation)

While the holy house was on fire, everything was plundered that came to hand; and ten thousand of those that were caught were slain; nor was there a commiseration of any age, or any reverence of gravity; but children, and old men, and profane persons, and priests were all slain in the same manner; so that this war went round all sorts of men, and brought them to destruction; and as well those that made supplication for their lives, as those that defended themselves by fighting. The flame was also carried a long way, and made an echo, together with the groans of those that were slain; and because this hill was high, and the works at the temple were very great, one would have thought the whole city had been on fire. Nor can one imagine anything either greater, or more terrible than this noise; for there was at once a shout of the Roman legions, who were marching all together; and a sad clamour of the seditious, who were now surrounded with fire and sword.

Now there was in the city a certain man, who kept crying out at all times, and declared aloud, “Woe, woe to Jerusalem!” And when the matter came to the procurator, he whipped the man, and asked him who he was, and what this cry meant; but the man made no answer, nor ceased his lamentation. For seven years and five months he continued to cry: “Woe, woe to Jerusalem!” And just at the time when his voice was heard from the wall, he was struck by a stone from an engine, and died, still uttering his last cry.

There were many false prophets at that time, who announced deliverance from God to the Jews, saying that they should recover their city and temple, and would receive miraculous signs of this deliverance; thereby the multitude were kept from deserting their city. But the prophecy proved false, and the ruin came upon them.

And besides these things, there were prodigies that appeared: the heavens seemed to threaten the city with portents; stars fell, comets were seen, and many other unusual things occurred, which were interpreted as forewarnings of the calamity that was to come.

All Pages
PDF Downloads