Praying for Evil Monsters when prayer itself is toxic anyway!
Prayer is communication with God. It is union with God and
believers say it is two way. God unites with you when you pray and
you unite with him. You can pray for others.
When terrorists murder innocent people, the ministerial sycophants
step smugly into their pulpits and remind the congregation that the
terrorists need its prayers. They need its prayers. That is they
have a right to be prayed for. Do they? The Church says we do not
deserve grace or help from God to live a holy life and we do not
deserve to be forgiven our sins. The purpose of praying for them is
that God will change their hearts. That he will do whatever it is
that will impress them best so that they will change. So if that
means making them get away with it, decide to give up terrorism and
start a happy family life or turning themselves in so be it. Also,
if somebody does something bad, Christianity and Islam would say
that they hope the person was insane for the sake of her or his soul
which is in danger of everlasting punishment. So praying for them
can amounts to several things. One of them is wishing that the
terrorists are insane. Clearly then the concern is not really for
the evil they have done but for the evil they intend. If they are
insane they don’t intend evil properly for they are sick. So it is
okay then if the terrorists keep killing people as long as they are
insane.
Do the terrorists need prayers then to keep them from getting their
come-uppance in Hell even if it means wishing that they might lose
health and limb in the process? Yes. Praying for them is therefore
more important than praying for the innocent victims or their
families. If there is a choice, it is the terrorists that should be
prayed for.
Praying for the terrorists is fanaticism. It is just another quieter
form of the exact same fanaticism that impels terrorists to maim and
murder. The praying is hypocrisy. It insults the victims. Prayer is
indeed a declaration of ones attitude that dogma has value and
people do not. Religion makes people so irrational that they might
not be able to let themselves see this.
People don't mind using prayers and magic to control others as long
as they tell themselves it is for the benefit of those people. Or in
the case of praying for wicked people, you hope to stop them and
change them. Religion says God controls us apart from how we use our
free will. How can it expect us to believe that it does not hope to
control people by praying for them? They are asking God who controls
others to control them - period.
If prayer is about getting something to interfere with the free will
of an evil dangerous person that does not fit the religious notion
that respect for the person is so important that they must be
allowed to use free will even to do harm. It is obvious such prayer
is passive-aggressive and dehumanises the harmful person. It is a
human thing to try and use anything you can think of to stop
somebody harming. But the religious person has no right to pretend
that praying for enemies is a graceful dignified thing. It is a
sweetened up channel for your toxic corrupting attitudes.
Religion contradicts all its sermons about the grandeur of free will
by saying that God causes all things and thus how they will behave.
You have free will then because of God and not in spite of him which
means there is no getting away from his control. A God who permits
you to act is still controlling.
Religion teaches that pure evil is impossible. It argues that only something good can do evil or make it possible for evil is an abuse of good and is a nothing in that sense. So something that manages to be pure evil would not be a something at all, it is a nothing. Religion says Satan is smart and preserves himself and abuses these good things to do harm. Rather than being wholly evil, Satan cherry-picks the evil he favours and would wield vengeance against any evil he does not like. Selfishness reigns there. So he is able to be wholly selfish without being wholly bad. It is because of good that he is able to be so selfish.
This makes no sense. If evil is a non-thing then the more evil one is the less of a person one is.
And also, even if pure evil is impossible who cares? A being that keeps 1% good in order to be 99% bad is virtually pure evil. Why split hairs?
The nonsense around this subject shows that thinking of a person as dangerous or evil unavoidably objectifies them.
Thus praying for them is based on lies and pretended love.
FINALLY:
Jesus said to expect the unexpected with prayer and with God's
mercy. He commanded not suggested that you pray for those killing
you and those whom you love. That weakens your sense of danger. You
expect the perpetrator to stop and repent. Despite the evidence, you
think it is not the way it seems to be and the person is actually
surrendering inside to God. Jesus used religion and psychological
trickery to get the sheep to let the wolves in.
The benefits of prayer for evil people do not come from prayer at
all. They are either down to a placebo, an irresponsible one that in
the long run is only for the worse. Or they were good things that
were going to happen anyway. That is why we should challenge
people’s faith in prayer and have no regrets. The benefits are
nothing compared to the damage that is done.
The WEB
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12608c.htm
Catholic Encyclopaedia. This discusses Quietism.
BOOKS CONSULTED
A CATECHISM OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE, CTS, London, 1985
A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 6, PART II, KANT, Frederick Copleston
SJ, Doubleday/Image, New York 1964
AQUINAS, FC Copleston, Penguin Books, London, 1991
BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, Friedrich Nietzsche, Penguin, London, 1990
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER, Association for the Promotion of Christian
Knowledge, Dublin, 1960
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Veritas, London, 1995
CHARITY, MEDITATIONS FOR A MONTH, Richard F Clarke SJ, Catholic
Truth Society, London, 1973
CHRISTIANITY FOR THE TOUGH-MINDED, Edited by John Warwick
Montgomery, Bethany Fellowship, Minnesota, 1973
CRISIS OF MORAL AUTHORITY, Don Cupitt, SCM Press, London, 1995
EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT, VOL 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha,
Scripture Press Foundation, Bucks, 1995
ECUMENICAL JIHAD, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1996
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De
Ligouri, Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli,
Monarch, East Sussex, 1995
HONEST TO GOD, John AT Robinson, SCM, London, 1963
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan,
1986
IN DEFENCE OF THE FAITH, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon,
1996
MADAME GUYON, MARTYR OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, Phyllis Thompson, Hodder &
Stoughton, London, 1986
RADIO REPLIES, 1, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul,
Minnesota, 1938
RADIO REPLIES, 2, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul,
Minnesota, 1940
RADIO REPLIES, 3, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul,
Minnesota, 1942
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen and Unwin Ltd,
1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Ed Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom College Press,
Virginia, 1982
THE BIBLE TELLS US SO, R B Kuiper, The Banner of Truth Trust,
Edinburgh, 1978
THE BRIEF OF ST ANTHONY OF PADUA (Vol 44, No 4)
The Dark Side, How Evangelical Teachings Corrupt Love and Truth,
Valerie Tarico, Ph.D, Dea Press, Seattle, 2006
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De
Ligouri, Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST, Thomas A Kempis, Translated by Ronald Knox
and Michael Oakley, Universe, Burns & Oates, London, 1963
THE LIFE OF ALL LIVING, Fulton J Sheen, Image Books, New York, 1979
THE PRACTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF GOD, Brother Lawrence, Hodder &
Stoughton, London, 1981
THE PUZZLE OF GOD, Peter Vardy, Collins, London, 1990
THE SATANIC BIBLE, Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books, New York, 1969
THE SPIRITUAL GUIDE, Michael Molinos, Christian Books, Gardiner
Maine, 1982
THE STUDENT’S CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, Rev Charles Hart BA, Burns & Oates,
London, 1961
UNBLIND FAITH, Michael J Langford, SCM, London, 1982