To what extent are the problem of good and the problem of evil complementary issues, and does disregarding either constitute a failure to honor God?
Here’s a clear, thoughtful way to understand this:
1. Are the “problem of good” and the “problem of evil” two sides of the same coin?
In many philosophical and theological traditions, yes, they can be thought of as two sides of the same coin, because both raise questions about how the world’s moral structure relates to God.
The Problem of Evil
This asks:
If God is all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, why does evil exist?
It challenges God’s goodness or power by pointing to suffering, injustice, and moral wrongdoing.
The Problem of Good
This asks:
If the universe were random, indifferent, or purely material, why do we find goodness, beauty, moral order, love, or altruism?
It challenges naturalistic or nihilistic worldviews by pointing to virtues and meaning that are hard to explain without some deeper grounding.
So they mirror each other:
Evil challenges belief in a good God.
Good challenges belief in a godless universe.
Both force us to examine how we interpret reality, morality, and purpose.
2. Do you “respect God” by ignoring either one?
Most religious philosophers would say no.
Ignoring either:
oversimplifies reality,
weakens faith rather than strengthening it,
and fails to take seriously the complexity of existence.
Respecting God can mean wrestling honestly with both:
Asking why suffering exists shows reverence for justice.
Asking why goodness exists shows reverence for gratitude and awe.
Engaging with both questions deepens understanding rather than blind acceptance.
BUT?
This hypothetical test asks which one should be the focus - if we have to literally forget one?
If we forget the problem of good, we can still fight for victims of evil.
If we forget the problem of evil, we forget God. We shut our eyes to good and good is his image.
I'd suggest forgetting God.